Abstract: This article examines the nature, sources, effects, and remedial strategies for misleading information within the criminal justice system of Liberia. Drawing on legal instruments, official reports, truth commission findings, and contemporary scholarship on misinformation and rule of law, the article argues that misleading information—both deliberate and inadvertent—erodes institutional legitimacy, obstructs justice, and risks violent social outcomes.
The article concludes with targeted reforms emphasizing communication protocols, legal accountability, media literacy, and technological interventions. (Approx. 2,000 words)
Introduction
The administration of criminal justice depends upon facts, reliable evidence, and public confidence in institutions. In Liberia, where decades of conflict and transitional governance have shaped contemporary institutions, misleading information remains a persistent threat to the effective functioning of police, prosecution, and the judiciary. Misleading information in this context includes misinformation (falsehoods spread without malicious intent), disinformation (falsehoods spread deliberately), and misinterpretation (errors produced by misunderstanding or poor legal knowledge). The significance of these phenomena is not merely academic: inaccurate narratives can compromise investigations, produce wrongful arrests or convictions, inflame public unrest, and diminish international support for justice-sector reform.
Nature and Sources of Misleading Information
Misleading information within the Liberian criminal justice system can take several forms — misinformation (false information shared without intent to deceive), disinformation (false information deliberately spread to deceive), and misinterpretation (incorrect understanding of legal facts or procedures).
Major sources include:
Law Enforcement Communication Gaps:
Inaccurate crime reports, poor evidence management, and exaggerated media briefings by security officials can lead to public confusion and misjudgment of ongoing cases.
Political Influence and Manipulation:
Politicians may exploit criminal justice institutions for personal or partisan gain, leading to the
distortion of facts about cases, arrests, or prosecutions.
Media Misrepresentation:
Some journalists, due to inadequate legal knowledge or pressure for sensational news, report incomplete or inaccurate details, thereby misleading the public about criminal proceedings.
Witness Misstatement or Fabrication:
Witnesses may unintentionally give false testimony due to fear, misunderstanding, or deliberate manipulation by third parties.
Public Misconception and Rumors:
In the age of social media, rumors and unverified information about police actions or court outcomes spread rapidly, shaping false narratives about justice processes.
Effects of Misleading Information on the Criminal Justice System
The consequences of misleading information are far-reaching:
Erosion of Public Trust:
Citizens lose confidence in the police, courts, and correctional services when they perceive dishonesty or inconsistency in official communication.
Obstruction of Justice:
False reports can compromise investigations, endanger witnesses, and lead to wrongful arrests or convictions.
Damage to Institutional Reputation:
When state institutions are viewed as unreliable or politically manipulated, their authority and legitimacy decline.
Escalation of Social Tension:
Misleading information about criminal cases—especially those involving ethnic, political, or social divisions—can provoke mob violence or public disorder.
International Image Damage:
Persistent misinformation within the justice sector undermines Liberia’s reputation globally, affecting foreign partnerships and donor confidence.
Case Reflections in Liberia
There have been instances where conflicting statements from the Liberia National Police (LNP) and the Ministry of Justice regarding high-profile criminal cases have generated public confusion. Similarly, misinformation on social media about police brutality or corruption has often triggered public outrage before formal investigations are concluded. Such incidents reveal a deep need for coordinated communication and factual reporting across all justice agencies.
Measures to Address Misleading Information
Strengthening Institutional Communication:
The LNP, Judiciary, and Ministry of Justice should establish centralized public affairs offices to ensure factual and uniform dissemination of information.
Training for Law Enforcement and Media Personnel:
Regular workshops on ethical reporting and legal communication can reduce misreporting and promote accurate storytelling of criminal cases.
Public Awareness and Legal Literacy:
Citizens must be educated about criminal procedures to help them discern facts from rumors and avoid spreading unverified claims.
Accountability Mechanisms:
Officials or media houses that deliberately circulate false information should face legal and administrative penalties.
Digital Monitoring Systems:
Developing a national media-monitoring and fact-checking platform can help detect and correct misinformation quickly before it spreads.
Legal and Institutional Context
Liberia’s criminal law framework rests largely on the Penal Law (adopted 1976, consolidated in subsequent editions) and more recent institutional statutes such as the Liberia National Police Act (2016), which rearticulated the role, mission, and professional standards expected of the
police service. The Penal Law establishes substantive offences and penalties, while the Police Act sets out policing mandates, oversight responsibilities, and principles intended to insulate policing from partisan influence. In practice, however, legislative frameworks operate within a broader ecosystem shaped by the legacy of the civil wars, the 2009 Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) findings, and ongoing international assistance programs aimed at strengthening rule of law and accountability.
Sources and Pathways of Misleading Information
The sources of misleading information within Liberia’s criminal justice process can be grouped into five principal categories:
Operational and Administrative Gaps within Law Enforcement: Irregular evidence handling, poorly documented crime reports, and inconsistent public briefings by police officials can produce misinformation that skews public understanding and hinders prosecution. Where chain-of-custody is weak or preliminary statements are contradicting, courts and investigators face added difficulty in establishing reliable fact patterns.
Political Interference and Partisan Messaging: Throughout Liberia’s modern history, political actors have at times sought to influence criminal investigations and judicial processes for partisan ends. Such interference may take the form of public pronouncements, selective leaks, or pressure on prosecutorial decision-making—all of which can introduce disinformation into the public sphere and into formal proceedings.
Media Misreporting and Sensationalism: Journalists and media houses—especially those operating with limited legal training or under commercial pressures—may publish incomplete or erroneous accounts of criminal events. Sensational headlines, blurred distinctions between allegation and proven fact, and incomplete use of legal terminology contribute to public misunderstanding of case status and judicial outcomes.
Social Media Rumors and Viral Falsehoods: The rapid spread of unverified claims on digital platforms magnifies the reach of misinformation. In Liberia’s urban and rural contexts alike, social media posts alleging police brutality, corruption, or high-profile crimes can prompt immediate public reaction before formal investigations have been concluded.
Witness Error, Intimidation, and Fabrication: Witnesses may provide inaccurate statements due to fear, confusion, or deliberate inducement. Intimidation—whether from private parties or public actors—can lead to recanted testimony or the production of affidavits that do not reflect the truth, creating further uncertainty for adjudicators.
Impacts on Justice and Society
The harmful effects of misleading information are both procedural and societal. Procedurally, erroneous or manufactured narratives can obstruct investigations, lead to misallocation of prosecutorial resources, and increase the risk of wrongful convictions or acquittals. Such outcomes undermine the rule of law and can violate the rights of victims and defendants alike.
Societally, misinformation corrodes public trust in state institutions. Where citizens perceive inconsistencies between official accounts and independent evidence—especially in a context still healing from civil conflict—confidence in police and the courts diminishes. This credibility deficit may reduce cooperation with law enforcement, deter reporting of crime, and heighten the likelihood of private or vigilante ‘justice’ that exacerbates social tensions. Moreover, misleading information in politically sensitive cases can inflame partisan or ethnic divisions, leading to protests, mob violence, or cycles of retaliation.
Illustrative Reflections from Liberia’s Transitional Experience
Liberia’s post-conflict trajectory provides instructive examples of how disputed narratives and opaque processes can hinder reconciliation and justice. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission documented patterns of impunity, politicized violence, and institutional weakness that contributed to public distrust. Subsequent reform efforts—such as police modernization and judicial capacity-building—have made progress but remain vulnerable to episodes in which public statements, leaks, or social-media-driven narratives complicate formal accountability processes.
Policy and Institutional Recommendations
To mitigate misleading information and strengthen public trust, this paper proposes a suite of reforms that are administrative, legal, and civic in character.
Centralized and Professionalized Public Information Units
Every major justice-sector actor—the Liberia National Police, the Ministry of Justice (Prosecution Service), and the Judiciary—should maintain a trained public affairs office responsible for official statements. These units must follow a standardized protocol: (a) verify facts before public release; (b) clearly label preliminary information as provisional; (c) provide timely corrections with the same prominence as initial statements; and (d) coordinate inter-agency messaging in high-profile cases to avoid contradiction.
Legal and Disciplinary Accountability for Deliberate Disinformation
The Penal Law and Police Act already provide frameworks for unlawful conduct; however, the state should consider targeted disciplinary rules and, where appropriate, criminal sanctions for officials who knowingly disseminate false information that materially obstructs justice or endangers individuals. Administrative tribunals and inspectorates must be empowered to investigate and sanction breaches promptly and transparently.
Capacity Building for Journalists and Media Houses
A national program—developed in partnership with professional associations and donor
agencies—should offer regular training on criminal-procedure reporting, evidence standards, and ethical journalism. Incentivizing legal literacy among reporters will reduce errors of interpretation and encourage responsible coverage that distinguishes between allegation and adjudicated fact.
Public Media Literacy Campaigns
Civil society and government should jointly fund public campaigns that educate citizens about legal processes, the difference between rumor and verified information, and safe online behaviour. Media literacy reduces the virality of false claims and empowers citizens to seek verification from official channels.
Rapid Fact-Checking and Digital Monitoring
A fact-checking consortium—composed of independent news outlets, civil-society organizations, and technical partners—should monitor trending claims related to criminal justice and publish quick, evidence-based corrections. The Liberia National Police and Ministry of Justice should make timely non-sensitive case information available on official websites to preempt speculation.
Witness Protection and Evidence-Management Reforms
Strengthened witness protection protocols will reduce recantations and deliberate fabrications. Capacity building in evidence collection, chain-of-custody procedures, and digital record-keeping will safeguard factual records against tampering and misreporting.
Implementation Challenges and Safeguards
Several challenges must be anticipated. First, reforms must guard against the misuse of ‘anti-misinformation’ powers to censor legitimate dissent or critical reporting. Safeguards—judicial oversight, procedural transparency, and independent review—are essential. Second, resourcing
constraints will limit the speed of institutional upgrades; international partners (e.g., UNDP, donor agencies) can assist with technical support, but sustainable funding must be prioritized in national budgets. Third, political will is indispensable: efforts to professionalize communication or sanction bad actors will require leadership commitment across administrations.
Conclusion
Misleading information within Liberia’s criminal justice system undermines investigative integrity, judicial fairness, and public confidence. Addressing it requires a balanced approach that combines institutional transparency, professional communication, legal accountability, media capacity-building, and civic education. If implemented conscientiously, these measures will reduce the harmful spread of falsehoods, restore trust in justice-sector institutions, and strengthen Liberia’s broader peacebuilding trajectory.
About the Author
Professional Profile Summary
Tarpeh L. U-sayee, Jr. is a seasoned Liberian law enforcement professional, criminal justice professor, and police training expert with a solid foundation in international relations, theology, and public service. With over a decade of experience in both law enforcement and criminal justice education, he currently serves as a trainer of the Executive Protection Service (EPS), the Liberia National Police Training Academy and lecture at various private universities in Liberia.
He holds a Master’s Degree in Foreign Service Leadership (International Relations), a Master of Divinity, dual Bachelor’s Degrees in Sociology and Criminal Justice, and an Associate Degree in Management. He is also a prospective doctoral graduate in Church Growth and Ministry.
Mr. U-sayee is a graduate of the Liberia Police Academy, the Louisiana State Police Academy (USA), and the Lagos State Police Academy (Nigeria). As an Apostle and spiritual leader, he brings a unique combination of ethical leadership, academic excellence, and practical field experience. His lifelong mission is centered on peacebuilding, unity, and the advancement of the rule of law in Liberia.
References
Carter Center. Prosecution of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: A Practical Manual for Liberia. Atlanta: Carter Center, n.d.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Liberia. Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Liberia. Monrovia: TRC, June 30, 2009.
Liberia. Penal Law, Liberian Codes Revised, Title 26. Approved July 19, 1976.
Liberia. Liberia National Police Act, 2016.
United Nations University. E. Albrecht et al. Disinformation and Peacebuilding in Sub-Saharan Africa. UNU, 2024.
U.S. Department of State. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Liberia 2022. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of State, 2023.
UNDP Liberia. Strengthening the Rule of Law in Liberia: Justice and Security for the Liberian People (Phase II). UNDP Liberia, ongoing.
PolicingLaw.Info. Liberia: Police Law and Use of Force Assessment, updated 2025.
Accountability Lab Liberia. Annual Report 2024. Monrovia: Accountability Lab, 2025.
Mathew, S. K. “The Disaster of Misinformation: A Review of Research in Social Media Misinformation.” Journal of Information Integrity, 2022.
